What common defense might a JOL holder use in a traffic violation case?

The option regarding lack of evidence is relevant as a defense because it directly addresses the burden of proof that rests on the prosecution. If there is inadequate or insufficient evidence to prove that the JOL holder committed the traffic violation, it could lead to a dismissal of the charges. In any legal case, including traffic violations, if the evidence does not convincingly establish that the alleged offense occurred, the individual can argue that they should not be held responsible for the infraction.

This defense is particularly strong in cases where there might be no witnesses, no clear photographic or video evidence, or if the details of the incident are conflicting or minor. The principle of due process asserts that one cannot be punished for a violation without concrete evidence proving their guilt, thereby making the lack of evidence a viable defense strategy for JOL holders facing traffic violations.